With much groaning and bile being spewed over the Hayden Christensen starring action flick Jumper, it was a film that was under my radar. With as much hate as the film garnered and not having much interest in the continuing work of “Mannikin Skywalker”, there was just never any strong urge. I’m generally down with most Samuel Jackson fare but still, not enough to invite myself for pain in suffering. When recently I found myself on the road with little to do and free HBO at my disposal, I figured it was time to take in this little super hero take and found myself mostly frustrated; yet I still found a few things to like.
The basic setup of “Jumper” works. There are definite efforts made to carve off the chaff that typically weighs down films such as these. In some ways it made the film feel rather quick and snappy as far as action films go, jumping straight in to the excitement and wasting no time for heavy character development. We were already privy to the basic plot of the film from the trailers and the film makers take good advantage. At first this process is slightly confusing. We don’t know anything at all about David Rice except for the fact that he can jump around and that Roland the Paladin doesn’t like it. They do a good job mixing in the character backgrounds as the first act progresses and soon you have just enough to make sense. This concept gets pushed beyond effective though as we’re given tiny side plots and characters that fit in well at first, however when we reach the end of the film we realize that they never tied off these side plots. This leaves “Jumper” a confusing story of super hero’s and their evil counterparts.
Sadly, this confusing leaves a bad after taste in the mouth for the viewer and makes the universal panning that “Jumper” received valid. The basic plot points are engrossing and some of the fights and effects are pretty decent yet they pass by too quickly with no chance at depth. There is an entire back story to be expanded on here in further films, but most likely we will never see this exposition on the plot. What exactly are these paladins hunting down the jumpers? What ever happened to the other Jumper, Griffin?
All of these plot holes and unfinished side arch’s could be forgivable if it wasn’t for the complete and utter lackluster quality to the active of all involved. Christensen is wooden at best and fails completely at drawing you in and making you feel sympathetic. When you’ve eschewed plot depth, you must rely on your actors and it simply isn’t here. I found myself more concerned over the out come of the twitchy Jumper sidekick Griffin, played by Jamie Bell. This character was quirky and had edges which Bell used to his advantage. Beyond these two, they’ve packed in some decent named co-stars to bank on but fell short. With the likes of Samuel L Jackson, Michael Rooker and Diane Lane, you’d expect a bit more fireworks on screen. Instead there is a definite feel of actors earning a paycheck and phoning in their performance. No love for the script, no emotion that we’re accustomed to seeing from them, nothing more that working to pay the bills. Again, when you have not plot depth to rely on, you come to place your bets with these folks and they fail to provide the extra support needed.
“Jumper” has sadly lived up to its reputation as a stinker of a movie. The ideas of providing a more stream lined super hero tale with out spandex suits or matching level outfits was a good one, it just fell short in execution. With actors that cared, or could act with emotion, the film could have been a pretty decent way to use up two hours. Instead, we’re left with frustration, confusion and boredom, none of which are signs of a time well spent.


Coming in at the tail of 70s fashion and atmosphere, “The Last Horror Film” is quite quirky in its appearance. Disco clothes and decorations lay the wacky atmosphere on thick. While it definitely feels dated, there are many aspects to the story that help connect the movie with modern sensibilities of unprecedented celebrity access in the age of Internet journalism, which lets the movie still feel relevant despite its corniness. There are a few gruesome murders here, a touch of gore and heaps of post 70’s excess, but its not the type of horror film that sets out to disgust the viewer. The most disturbing aspect of the film comes from the extremely sweaty Vinny and the unhinged portrayal of a man obsessed.
This week we finally get the chance to dig into Sam Raim’s “Drag Me To Hell”, and Mark kills the mood with the creepiest Google search ever. SPOILERS ABOUND here, so don’t listen unless you’ve seen the movie.
A man; by himself, pitch black surroundings. He has no idea where he his, who he is, or how he got there. All that can be seen is a random strobing light. As he gropes around through the dark, he comes across the corpse of another man. More of a dried husk than a corpse really. He continues to pick his way through the rocky darkness in search of the source of the strobing light. Soon, he stumbles on the broken down remains of some kind of base or fortification in the depths of the cave. As he prods about, he activates a large wall sized view screen. Various voices in a multitude of languages assault him until he is able to focus in on the English speaking voice, which says to him; “Welcome to Eden Log”.
Writing idols, heroes, visionaries, etc. Most writers have them, I’m no exception. For me, Dr. Hunter S. Thompson has stood at the top of my list of writers to idolize for years. I don’t fancy any notions that I do in fact write as good as he does; that’s a lofty goal to reach. Especially with him carving out his own genre, fans and place in literary history. Still, he always wrote with a mind towards stark naked truth and aimed to achieve that truth by experiencing it and never backed down from anyone who tried to keep him from reaching that goal. All traits to admire in a writer as far as I’m concerned.
Let’s get this out of the way. This movie? It made me giddy. It made me enjoy a night at the theater more than I have in quite awhile. And I go a lot. “Drag Me to Hell”? Loved every minute of it. Sure, it sounds fanboyish for certain and I’ll be honest, it really is. At the same time though, getting Sam Raimi back behind the camera for a horror flick is an event worthy of dreaded fanboyism. I’ll do my best to tell you why I liked it with minimal squeals and giggles.
In the acting department, star of the movie Alison Lohman centers herself solidly in a new found role of scream queen. Fully engrossing in her tormented state yet still managing to capture the goofy humor that is a trademark of Sam Raimi horror, she fit in well. The rest of the cast are meant to be not much more that set pieces, but they do quite well. Especially in the case of Lorna Raver, the lady cast in the unfortunate role of Mrs. Ganush, the gypsy lady who gets Lohman in trouble. No offense to Ms. Raver, but she was downright nasty in this flick and the lady fully engrossed herself in the role and did a stellar job. She’ll make you feel for her and turn around repel you in disgust in the same breath making the film all the more enjoyable.
“True Blood” made a big splash when it hit airwaves. Author Charlaine Harris brings a heavy following from her long established book series, Anna Paquin brings in some of her own and HBO series pretty much scream quality. So, it seemed like a given. Mix in the supernatural aspects what with Vampire politics, shape shifters and who knows what else out there, the series more or less hit the ground running.

Friends
RSS Feed




